Burk, Denny R. Articular Infinitives in the Greek of the New Testament: On the Exegetical Benefit of Grammatical Precision. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2006. 200 pp. $55.00.
Dr. Denny Burk of the Criswell College in Dallas, Texas has offered the field of Greek language studies a helpful and insightful treatment on the articular infinitive. Before one thinks that such a task is too large for one work, it should be noticed that he has focused his research on the 324 examples of this construction in the New Testament itself while using examples from the Septuagint to test his thesis. This approach will no doubt be an asset to grammarians and exegetes whose focus is the New Testament.
Burk rightly conveys the need for his study when he points out that most New Testament reference grammars and commentaries do not include the insights brought about through modern linguistics. Heretofore such an incorporation is largely absent. While Burk’s work does not propose to generate a new reference grammar, it does propose a linguistic analysis of one important aspect of that grammar—the articular infinitive. This he has successfully done. In this concisely-written work of 141 pages (including a helpful appendix and a number of tables and figures), Burk seeks to ask and answer the following question: “What is the semantic and/or syntactic value of the articular infinitive in New Testament Greek?” or, “What does the article contribute to the meaning of the infinitive in New Testament Greek?” (2).
To answer this question he first argues that the article is a determiner and that determiners have the sole semantic function of marking substantives as definite (128). In his second chapter (pp. 27-46) he concludes that when the article is grammatically necessary, one should not look for the additional semantic significance of determination (44-46). His goal is for his research to successfully demonstrate the article’s necessity as a function word in connection with the infinitive. If this is demonstrable, then one would have no reason to argue that the article has its normal semantic force as a determiner (cf. 110, 144). In chapters three (articular infinitives not following a preposition, pp. 47-74) and four (articular infinitives following a preposition, pp. 75-110), Burk gives examples of the New Testament’s usage of the articular infinitive in which the appearance of the article is “grammatically obligatory,” i.e., the article either marks the case of the infinitive and/or it specifies a particular grammatical function that could not be made explicit were the article absent. In his fifth chapter and five (articular infinitives in the LXX, pp. 111-27), he tests his thesis by exploring 23 so-called exceptions that have been cited in the LXX. In each example Burk shows that these do not, in fact, undermine his thesis as it is argued in the preceding chapters (126-27; cf. 128).
The book ends with what may be the most useful part of his monograph. Rather than leaving the reader to ascertain the implications of the preceding chapters, Burk gives a sketch of just how the implications of his thesis can be carried over into the task of grammar as well as exegesis. In other words, the final chapter is given to demonstrate why his thesis is valuable to New Testament scholars, students, and preachers. First, Burk demonstrates how his thesis impacts Hellenistic grammatical study. He rightly laments that even the best works on New Testament grammar do not incorporate the advances in general linguistics, particularly pertaining to the concept of definitiveness and “how this concept relates to the conventions used in Greek to mark definitiveness” (129). Further, he asserts that his research has helpful implications of both case semantics (131-32) and the interpretation of prepositional phrases (132). Second, he illustrates how his thesis plays out in doing the specific task of exegesis and how it influences interpretation. One sees the benefit (and necessity!) of grammatical precision when interpreting such texts as Mark 9:10, Acts 25:11, Romans 13:8, Philippians 2:6, and Hebrews 10:31. Burk demonstrates how his thesis impacts the exegesis of these sample texts, and interacts with select New Testament scholars on these passages. He shows that an overreading of the presence of the article with the infinitive may lead to unwarranted exegetical conclusions. His inclusion of this particular section is most welcomed and demonstrates the inseparable connection between grammar and exegesis.
Greek grammar is still a discipline in need of advancement, and Burk has illustrated an important area where Greek grammarians have not been in agreement. This lack of agreement is apparent when one peruses the standard grammars as well as many technical New Testament commentaries. It remains to be seen if Burk’s thesis will gain traction in the realm of Greek grammar (and more importantly in the commentaries), but what has been put forward is a viable and defensible articulation of the syntactical significance of the article when it accompanies the infinitive in the New Testament.
St. Andrews itself is a wonderful little town. I have several pictures here that I will post, but the most impressive was the St. Andrews Cathedral. It is truly stunning. What is so stunning is the sheer size of the cathedral. It took over 100 years to build, but not that long to tear it to ruins. The ruins of the walls, columns, and altar are all there.
